TopazModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: TopazI've used it though more some of the other tools than adjust. I think that's a question you have to answer for yourself. In other words, what is your creative vision and have you attained it? It's the sort of theing that may be appropriate to use layers in Photoshop to generate an effect for specific parts of the image only. One thing I notice though, is that there are haloes around the wires which is not to me a good thing though may be easy enough to adjust.
Re: TopazAs Murray says, what is the outcome you want from this image? Have you achieved that?
And yes, this appears to be a tad oversharpened. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: TopazThanks for your responses. I don't mind the effects that can be achieved with this plug in. The issue I have is that the changes are destructive. They are not done on separate layers from the originals. What I dislike also is that I cannot actually see what is being done to achieve this effect. There are a lot of options within the plug-in which allow you to achieve similar high-contrast effects. You can try the plug in with a 30 day trial period.
Alex
Re: TopazI've actually got the program, they were at the expo in Melbourne last year, i've got the full version for mac and pc. It seemed a good buy at the time and the presentation they gave was quite convincing but I too found out when using it that it never created a new layer etc, and the only way to make sure you didn't destroy your real image was to save it before using the program and saving it under a new name once you've made each change, but its quite annoying when you have made multiple changes to it! There are pro's and cons to the software itself, but i think on the right image it works well, but you've gotta find which images to use it with and in all honesty I prefer using my nik software now, but I do use Topaz -rarely now though. Thats just a little of my experience with it, but I agree about the halo's with the power lines, a bit too over done!
2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
Re: Topaz
Thanks for sharing your experience. I feel I prefer to make my own changes in layers and at least I know what exactly is being doen to the image and can undo or vary it. I don't think I will go for the full version of this plug in. Cheers Alex
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|