| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Willy wombat on Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:21 am
 Had my first trip in a helicopter during my trip to the Bungles in July. No doors. I dont think I have ever gripped the camera so tightly.  I read that it pays to keep your shutter speed high because of the vibrations, so I tried my best. I struggled with positioning the circ pol filter in a few shots under difficult shooting situations. Think large man in small sardine can.    Here are 4 shots. Please feel free to let me know what you think  1.    2.    3.    I used Virtual photographer to provide an oranage boost to #3 4.    
			
				 Willy wombat
Senior Member Posts: 2284Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pmLocation: Bentleigh, VIC Australia 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by aim54x on Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:32 am
 I would love to have the opp to shoot from a helicopter! The images however look a bit too bright, maybe pull back the exposure a bit to stop the colours from washing out. CameronNikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
			
				 aim54x
Senior Member Posts: 7305Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pmLocation: Penshurst, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by agriffiths on Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:15 am
 I shoot hanging out of a helicopter almost on a daily basis (weather permitting) but have never had the oportunity to shoot the red centre. You've inspired me to make the trip! 
			
				 agriffiths
Member Posts: 445Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:11 pmLocation: Melbourne / Canberra
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Oz_Beachside on Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:00 pm
 looks like a wonderful place for an offshore call centre! interesting perspective, and good choice of aperture me thinks.   
			
				 Oz_Beachside
Senior Member Posts: 2227Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pmLocation: Black Rock, Victoria.  D200 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Willy wombat on Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:06 pm
 aim54x wrote:images look a bit too bright 
 Thanks for mentioning this It was certainly testing light (about 10am) with the sun still low enough to provide all those shaddow areas but bright enought to make exposure difficult. Do you think this is true for all of them or is there one specifically you think the exposure is off on. 
			
				 Willy wombat
Senior Member Posts: 2284Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pmLocation: Bentleigh, VIC Australia 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Willy wombat on Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:08 pm
 agriffiths wrote:I shoot hanging out of a helicopter almost on a daily basis (weather permitting)
 I would love to see some of your work please  Do you have any tips for beginners like me? 
			
				 Willy wombat
Senior Member Posts: 2284Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pmLocation: Bentleigh, VIC Australia 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Willy wombat on Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:17 pm
 Oz_Beachside wrote:interesting perspective, and good choice of aperture me thinks.  
 Thanks Bruce 
			
				 Willy wombat
Senior Member Posts: 2284Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pmLocation: Bentleigh, VIC Australia 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by aim54x on Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:33 pm
 Willy wombat wrote:aim54x wrote:images look a bit too bright 
 Thanks for mentioning this It was certainly testing light (about 10am) with the sun still low enough to provide all those shaddow areas but bright enought to make exposure difficult. Do you think this is true for all of them or is there one specifically you think the exposure is off on.
 I am having a bit of trouble with this at the moment, so many uncalibrated monitors....on my laptop all of them looked a bit too bright, on this computer they only look a tiny bit out....i'll check on another screen when I get the chance. How do they look to you?CameronNikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
			
				 aim54x
Senior Member Posts: 7305Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pmLocation: Penshurst, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ian.bertram on Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:40 pm
 I love 'em- on this monitor they don't look over cooked, just rich and full. What glass were you using? 
			
				 ian.bertram
Member Posts: 188Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:35 pmLocation: Panania, South Western Sydney, NSW
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:44 pm
 Think large man in small sardine can. 
 oh boy, i know how ya feel! plus I bet you were in a little Robinson R22 or R44 - imo unless a helicopter has got a turbine I ain't getting in it.. #3 is the standout for me, mainly since it really reflects what it really looks liek out there (colour wise), also the landscape orientation suits. The other portrait style ones need a bit of warmth i think, those yellow bands are quite pronounced in real life and maybe that extra bit of warmth will reflect that?, I know your POV would have been limited but a landscape orientation might have worked better. I struggled with positioning the circ pol filter
    and i bet that pilot was not worried about the sun direction either...   
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by agriffiths on Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:13 pm
 I would love to see some of your work please 
 Do you have any tips for beginners like me?
 My website is www.lensaloft.com.au Tips? Practice practice practice.... and then practice some more. It's a steep expensive learnging curve and when things go wrong your wallet takes a beating, although when they go right it makes it all worth while. Feel free to give me a call if you want to know anything specific. I've only just returned to the office after another shoot at lunch time. We had 45 knot (83km/h) headwinds on the way to the site and were being overtaken by cars below us. I could have sworn we were flying backwards at one stage. On the upside we came back like a rocket!  I'll post a photo of the chopper in a moment   . It was laughable! 
			
				 agriffiths
Member Posts: 445Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:11 pmLocation: Melbourne / Canberra
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by agriffiths on Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:01 pm
 Here it is. The wind was so strong it almost took off before we even got in!  First time in this chopper and seeing this gave me a feeling of unease.  
			
				 agriffiths
Member Posts: 445Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:11 pmLocation: Melbourne / Canberra
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:49 pm
 ahhh the old schweizer 269C, no wonder you had a 'feeling of unease.' Like the Robinson R22, you just hope the engine keeps going...auto-rotation in things this size are... interesting.. 
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by agriffiths on Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:22 pm
 To be honest I wasn't really worried about the auto, although it did take a couple of goes to get the engine started... I was more worried about mechanical linkage failure. I think every pulley and linkage on that thing showed signs of wear and rust. Much harder to recover from linkage failure than it is to auto. Seeing that my life was in the hands of a stand of rusted wire was what really had me concerned. Maybe its time to up my prices... and life insurance.
 I didn't have much choice today though since my regular heli's were booked up.
 
			
				 agriffiths
Member Posts: 445Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:11 pmLocation: Melbourne / Canberra
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:39 pm
 signs of wear and rust
  
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by agriffiths on Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:55 pm
  LOL, I've just seen they've grounded the ch10 traffic chopper. Too windy    
			
				 agriffiths
Member Posts: 445Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:11 pmLocation: Melbourne / Canberra
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by gstark on Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:16 pm
 Those mechanicals would not look out of place on a '63 beetle.  g.Gary Stark
 Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
 The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
 
			
				 gstark
Site Admin Posts: 22926Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pmLocation: Bondi, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Willy wombat on Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:20 pm
 You are a dare devil dude....!     
			
				 Willy wombat
Senior Member Posts: 2284Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pmLocation: Bentleigh, VIC Australia 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by agriffiths on Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:05 pm
 Those mechanicals would not look out of place on a '63 beetle. 
 Funny, I had exactly the same thought. Although I'm sure the beetle would be far more advanced.   
			
				 agriffiths
Member Posts: 445Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:11 pmLocation: Melbourne / Canberra
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by surenj on Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:17 pm
 agriffiths wrote:Those mechanicals would not look out of place on a '63 beetle. 
 Funny, I had exactly the same thought. Although I'm sure the beetle would be far more advanced.  
 This engine also looks to be air cooled    
			
				 surenj
Senior Member Posts: 7197Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pmLocation: Artarmon NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by gstark on Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:18 pm
 agriffiths wrote:Those mechanicals would not look out of place on a '63 beetle. 
 Funny, I had exactly the same thought. Although I'm sure the beetle would be far more advanced.  
 Not to mention amphibious.g.Gary Stark
 Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
 The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
 
			
				 gstark
Site Admin Posts: 22926Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pmLocation: Bondi, NSW 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |