D2X + 105/2.8 imageModerator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
D2X + 105/2.8 imageThis is a 100% crop of a full size D2X image taken using the 105/2.8 micro-nikkor
Guess who it is What has amazed me when processing these images is even when I quite badly underexposed the images are still very clean... I like it... I like it alot.. New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Looks like Glen to me...
Scott... You might also want to include a scaled down version of the original image... a 100% crop doesn't mean a lot without seeing the original photo you cut it from... With the 105mm you could have been standing 1ft away to take that shot... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
yeah... I wanted to preserve the mystery for a moment...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
What's with the colour in the image?
He looks like something out of Goldfinger... Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Glen has just left my place and he most certainly does not look like Goldfinger
There is a very strong yellow cast in this pic IMO. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
I'll have a play
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
That's the wonderful encrypted white balance for you Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Cut down the green and cooled slightly New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
At the risk of being pedantic - it wasn't Goldfinger that was gold - it was actually one of his employees Jill Masterson (played by Shirley Eaton in the film) who was asphyxiated by having her body toatally covered in gold paint.
As a final piece of trivia it's been claimed that this wasn't possible (asphyxiation because of paint over your pores), but ont the excellent MyhBusters show when they tested this they had to stop because the painted subject had climbing blood pressure and was feeling unwell. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Stubbsy, I said "out of" Goldfinger, as I know that Auric Goldfinger wasn't the gold one.
I know my Bond... Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Yep. Noticed that. I was correcting the others who obviously don't know their Bond. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I love mythbusters... best show on TV at the moment...
BOT: How about that resolution... just blows my mind really... New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
goldfinger is appropriate - there's that james bond sparkle in the eye going on
i'd have looked at the crop and said the image is a tad soft but the scaled down version looks reasonably sharp. what scale is best used to determine sharpness ?
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|