RAW Processing?

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

RAW Processing?

Postby Nikkofan on Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:02 pm

Hi All

My sincere apologies for asking what I'm sure is an already raised topic (but I can't find it here so far!) but can I ask you guys what your procedure is for converting RAW images into JPG?, ie: how you do it, what software, are you happy with the results, is there a process & certain settings that you recommend?

Reason I'm asking is because I've found with my D70 & D200 that the images look clear & sharp in RAW but after they've gone through the conversion process, they lose sharpness & seem to gain a lot of noise and look a bit "washed out" - the D70 is much worse than the D200 - and I'm wondering if anyone else has noticed this occurring. I'm using the 17-55 2.8 mainly on the D200 and the 85 1.4 on the D70.

I'm using Bridge - Image Processor - to convert the files if they don't need adjusting, or Photoshop to convert if they do, and the result is the same with either process. It's really frustrating and I'd love to resolve it.

Thanks all
Nikon D70, Nikon D200, Nikon F100, Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm, Nikon 17-55mm, Nikon 85mm, Nikon 24mm, Nikon 60mm, Nikon 105mm, Tamron 70-300, SB800, SB28, LSPJ
Nikkofan
Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 11:50 am
Location: Sydney's Beautiful South

Postby Killakoala on Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:46 pm

One thing i thought of as i read your synopsis is that perhaps your colourspaces are different in each of your processes. That will make your images look washed out, but maybe not lose sharpness or add noise, then again maybe it would.

My process is simple. I use PSCS RAW convertor and then complete the PPing in PSCS. I use Nikon Capture to do batch conversions to JPG then PP in PSCS.

I try to keep everything in Adobe RGB until I save for the web, when I convert to sRGB.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby gooseberry on Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:40 pm

What I have found (and a lot of more experienced photogs have found) is that Adobe Camera Raw in PS CS is not so good for Nikon RAW files (especially if you are using default settings) - ACR tends to not do the colours correctly and introduces more noise than other converters. To get the colours right in CS, you have to do a lot of calibration adn even then I find it's not as good as default settings in Capture or Capture NX.
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby Nikkofan on Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:50 pm

One thing i thought of as i read your synopsis is that perhaps your colourspaces are different in each of your processes. That will make your images look washed out, but maybe not lose sharpness or add noise, then again maybe it would.


Killakoala, how do you check your colourspaces in each process? :oops: I'm embarassed to admit that I have no idea about this!

Gooseberry, having checked this out further, I'm coming to the same conclusion, ie: that Capture NX seems to be a better option than Camera Raw. Stooopid question, but can you just download Capture NX and load it into PSCS2 as a plugin?

Thanks for your responses guys, and if anyone has any other thoughts or processes that they recommended, I'd be grateful to hear them.
Nikon D70, Nikon D200, Nikon F100, Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm, Nikon 17-55mm, Nikon 85mm, Nikon 24mm, Nikon 60mm, Nikon 105mm, Tamron 70-300, SB800, SB28, LSPJ
Nikkofan
Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 11:50 am
Location: Sydney's Beautiful South

Postby stubbsy on Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:06 pm

Lyn

Capture NX is commercial software from Nikon. It's listed for sale in our bargains area. AFAIK it's a standalone product.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Marvin on Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:05 pm

I have the same issues. There are a couple of threads about this.

If I can't get a photo to open as I would like it in PS then I open it in Nikon Capture and then again into PS. Nikon Capture applies the settings as you have them in the camera, PS doesn't. Nikon View does when you use it to view your raw files so what you open in NC is the same as you view in NV.

Don't know if this helps or not!!

Lee
Nikon D7000
User avatar
Marvin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests