Make sure you get your model release signed...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby Reschsmooth on Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:08 pm

What happens when a 7 month old decides a lens is a plaything :D

(The joys of a MF lens when you can't look through the viewfinder)

Image

Image
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby gstark on Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:35 am

Patrick,

Have you tried any alternate crops with these two images?

I think both would look great cropped square.

For the first, crop from a little bit below the hand - probably keep some, but not all, of the chin - and also crop a nudge off the top, to make it square. Keep all of the hand, but you want to emphasise how the hand is framing the face.

For the second, again use the hand to frame the image: crop above the thumb that's obscuring the FoV (eliminate the upper section of the image) and use that as your guide to keeping a square section of the lower part of the image. The expression in this image is superb, and I think that by cropping, you will help to draw the viewer's atention back in on this.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby Wocka on Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:49 am

I love the first one Patrick.

My 18 month old loves the camera, she comes running everytime I get it out.
I have many of these types shots, often followed by 5 minutes cleaning the UV filter. But it's all worth it.

Cheers.
Warwick
=======
Canon 40D : 350D
Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
User avatar
Wocka
Member
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: Northern Beaches

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby Reschsmooth on Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:10 am

Thanks for the feedback, Gary & Warwick.

Gary, I have adopted your square crop suggestions. Are these what you had in mind? (I think your suggestion of a square crop is spot on - 6x6 all the way).

Image


Image
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby mickeyjuice on Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:13 am

Yep, square works really well.

I'm always amazed when playing in Lightroom just how much difference the different crops make.
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby gstark on Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:42 am

Patrick,

Reschsmooth wrote:Gary, I have adopted your square crop suggestions. Are these what you had in mind? (I think your suggestion of a square crop is spot on - 6x6 all the way).


Exactly.

I think that these are just A1 now: you have natural framing within the image from the hand that's partially obscuring the lens, but as you already observed, the partial obscuring helps to add a point of focus to the image. You've now eliminate those parts of the image that are outside of the framing, and I think the results are very worthy: print big and hang on the wall.

FWIW, the images are soft, to the point of being out of focus, but I think that is a part of the charm of these. I don't think these would look half as good were the focus pin-sharp.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby Reschsmooth on Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:45 am

gstark wrote:FWIW, the images are soft, to the point of being out of focus, but I think that is a part of the charm of these. I don't think these would look half as good were the focus pin-sharp.


That's right, Gary. They are out of focus as I had to rely on manual focus and, even to that extent, had to rely on the distance markers on the lens barrel as I couldn't get my eye to the viewfinder. I agree with your comment that the OOF element adds to the obscure charm of these. :D
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby big pix on Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:52 pm

great stuff...... the look in the second is fantastic and should be framed, the softness adds to the look....... sticky fingers on the lens is another issue
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:45 pm

I have been looking at these pics for the past couple of days trying to understand why they were posted.

OK, I’m a father too and I can understand the joy of a child and what they can bring into your life. But to me these pics are badly composed and have no credibility that deserve any critique as to method and purpose. They are pics that should reside in the family album and nowhere else.

Sorry Patrick but you can do, and have done, better than this.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby Geoff on Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:56 pm

Chris,
I appreciate what you are saying..absolutely... but do you not also agree with what Gary has said? They aren't technically great but are worthy (more than JUST the family album?). Does a photo have to be techincally perfect before it can be shown to a wider audience than only family/friends? Be keen to hear your thoughts on this cos I respect you as a friend and photographer :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:54 am

sirhc55 wrote:I have been looking at these pics for the past couple of days trying to understand why they were posted.

OK, I’m a father too and I can understand the joy of a child and what they can bring into your life. But to me these pics are badly composed and have no credibility that deserve any critique as to method and purpose. They are pics that should reside in the family album and nowhere else.

Sorry Patrick but you can do, and have done, better than this.


Hi Chris

You have raised two valid, distinct yet linked questions:

1. Are the photos of a good technical quality?
2. Are they worth posting here or anywhere in the public domain?

To answer the first - no they are not. They are out of focus and, as you said, of questionable compositional quality (hence Gary's comments suggesting a different crop). They are images of Alex's inquisitiveness captured within a technically challenged environment - I could not look through the viewfinder and hence composition and focus were guessed (the lens used could only be used in manual focus mode, as previously stated). But the technical qualities, or lack of them, is not what drew me to these images. I took about 10 or so at the time, and the rest will probably go to the recycle bin as the moment captured does not compensate sufficiently the poor technical qualities of the image.

The second is an interesting question. I posted the images in the Image Reviews and Critiques thread which obviously implied that I was seeking critical appraisal from forum members. As I alluded to above, this was not the case as I was sharing the images - hence, your question is justified to the extent that probably placed the images in the wrong thread (perhaps they should have been in the Humour or Gallery threads?). However, the fact that I was provided excellent feedback which helped, in my opinion, to improve the images, was very welcome.

But I believe your question goes further - should they have been posted in a public domain for those beyond family to view? First, I will say that if everyone considered the appropriateness of the content they post on the internet and acted on those considerations, 99.9% of blogs and the Daily Telegraph online wouldn't exist :twisted: . Seriously, ignoring the appropriateness of the thread in which they were posted, I simply posted the images to share a humourous moment between Alex & I with other people. A more specific title would have aided others in determining whether to spend the short amount of time spent viewing them.

I trust I haven't come across as defensive?

Cheers
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:39 am

Reschsmooth wrote:
Hi Chris

You have raised two valid, distinct yet linked questions:

1. Are the photos of a good technical quality?
2. Are they worth posting here or anywhere in the public domain?

To answer the first - no they are not. They are out of focus and, as you said, of questionable compositional quality (hence Gary's comments suggesting a different crop). They are images of Alex's inquisitiveness captured within a technically challenged environment - I could not look through the viewfinder and hence composition and focus were guessed (the lens used could only be used in manual focus mode, as previously stated). But the technical qualities, or lack of them, is not what drew me to these images. I took about 10 or so at the time, and the rest will probably go to the recycle bin as the moment captured does not compensate sufficiently the poor technical qualities of the image.

The second is an interesting question. I posted the images in the Image Reviews and Critiques thread which obviously implied that I was seeking critical appraisal from forum members. As I alluded to above, this was not the case as I was sharing the images - hence, your question is justified to the extent that probably placed the images in the wrong thread (perhaps they should have been in the Humour or Gallery threads?). However, the fact that I was provided excellent feedback which helped, in my opinion, to improve the images, was very welcome.

But I believe your question goes further - should they have been posted in a public domain for those beyond family to view? First, I will say that if everyone considered the appropriateness of the content they post on the internet and acted on those considerations, 99.9% of blogs and the Daily Telegraph online wouldn't exist :twisted: . Seriously, ignoring the appropriateness of the thread in which they were posted, I simply posted the images to share a humourous moment between Alex & I with other people. A more specific title would have aided others in determining whether to spend the short amount of time spent viewing them.

I trust I haven't come across as defensive?

Cheers



Patrick, a lucid description of your purpose which has no defensive content, as I hope my own post was not viewed as offensive.

Maybe I was being too pedantic with regard to the images, but I based my comments on a critique scenario and without making any constructive comments made a rather blunt comment. Under normal circumstance, if a member posts a pic of a child that is not their own, the comments posted are not biased. But when it is a child of the member there tends to be a more reserved approach to making any comments that could be seen as offensive.

I have no problem at all with pics of children (I have posted some myself) and to enforce my point I just loved the pic that Owen posted recently.

In the end it comes down to every individuals approach to viewing any image and as I said, this image is one for the family album because it will bring joy to both of you in the years to come.

Pax
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:20 am

Chris, I took no offence at your comments, particularly those regarding the critique of the photos, and, to an extent, agree with them. And, yes, my frame of reference when viewing them will be biased by the emotional aspect of them, and, perhaps, others may be less inclined to provide negative criticism of a photo of one's child than a photo of a car, bird or bird :D However, I don't believe people would give positive comments just to avoid potentially being 'offensive', but would, instead, just not provide any feedback - I trust that makes sense?

That said, I don't necessarily agree with your comments regarding the appropriateness of posting the images in a public domain, although perhaps DSLRUsers may not be the place to post images for which critical feedback is not sought? However, this is the forum where people can and do politely choose to disagree without getting offensive or defensive. :D
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Make sure you get your model release signed...

Postby Bindii on Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:06 am

Personally I love them.. they are right up my alley.. and yeah yeah I know that compostionally and technically they are suposed to be 'bad shots'.. but sometimes its no about that.. sometimes its about art... and art has no rules.. if its pleasing to the eye then its good.. and sure it may not be pleasing to everyones eye but thats the beauty of photography... I would be enlarging and framing the mono.. :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques