Page 1 of 1

any nikon users with a sigma 30mm f1.4 ?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:58 pm
by vikin70
my lens lust is saying buy this... but i'd appreciate informed verdicts, please... i haf a 50 1.8 but it is quite annoying to stand so far away from the subject...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:14 pm
by shutterbug
I have it :wink:

Highly recommended !!!
Tack sharp, great for available light images :wink:
Great price too.

BUY IT !!!!

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:10 pm
by Oz_Beachside
anyone know if nikon have, or are making, a similar, fast (1.8min) standard lens (less than 50mm), which is DX and film compatible. AF. I see older lenses, but anything more recent (post circa 1950)?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:27 pm
by MCWB
I have it too, and echo Vince's comments, great lens.

Oz: AF 28 mm f/1.4 (but not cheap), also AF 35mm f/2 (not faster than f/1.8, but lots more affordable than the 28/1.4).

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:53 pm
by Yi-P
I got the 35mm f/2, I like it so far, great lens for going everywhere. Practically being replacing my 50mm f1.8. Just 1/3 stop slower than 1.8 but colours are really good, sharpness is great after f2.8 and amazing after f4 all way up to f16 and back down again.

Its the lens I use most indoors where I have room to walk around or just out and about on a light kit.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:28 pm
by vikin70
28mm f1.4!?
oh, found it... http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/2814af.htm
only the second most expensive nikon lens ... :shock:
hmmm, so... 35mm f2 cheaper n trustworthy nikon or 30mm f1.4 wider bigger aperture sigma... i think in this case i would go for sigma...

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:03 am
by bumthology
i have a d40 with sigma 30mm f.14 !
let me tell u i thought it wasnt quite sharp (after taking lots of pics in my room) but when i took daylight pics, its so sharp i can see my mates nosehair hehe

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:07 pm
by skyva
I have it and it is my most used lens for indoor portaits. I have to 50mm 1.4 as well but indoors with friends and family the 50mm is too long, and 30mm is about right.
It is a great purchase for its price. I got mine from Vanbar in Melbourne as i wanted to make sure that it focussed ok, as there apparently issues with early ones. Make sure you can return it if you have focus issues.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:39 pm
by vikin70
thx for the advice, buy buy buy

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:52 pm
by Gordon
yea, buy it :) I love mine which gives nice sharp images on my D200, and I would say its a lot sharper than the Nikon 50mm f/1.4 when used wide open, the aspheric element really does help.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:10 pm
by Onyx
Image

Thanx Nnnnsic for letting me play, and Daniel_r for posing. Great lens this one. Short depth of field is fun to play with. Min focus distance a little less than anticipated (IIRC 0.40m), but that's with me being used to the 17-35 (0.28m or thereabouts). Normal people who don't attempt macro/close-ups with a wideangle lens will find it's mostly a non-issue.

Field of view is ideal as 'normal' lens on DSLR. More useful than a 50mm IMHO. HSM makes AF fast and silent. Only negative point I find it tends to overexpose slightly under D200's matrix meter. -2/3EV and it'll be what I consider 'ideal' exposure.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:18 pm
by skyva
I have the 50mm 1.4 and 30mm sigma. I use the sigma much more and are very happy with the results.